Re: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc

2003-12-10 Thread Bill Landry
CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc > Do you have an example of how to configure the dcc_conf? The INSTALL.txt > and dccifd.html offers very little on this. > > <> > > >

RE: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc

2003-12-10 Thread Smart,Dan
sday, December 10, 2003 7:57 AM | Subject: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc | | | > | > The DCC documentation says that the dccifd interface is much more | efficient | > than dccproc. I see from doing a spamassassin -D that it | looks for it. | > | > Is there any install p

Re: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc

2003-12-10 Thread Bill Landry
environment than dccproc, since it does not need to be instantiated for each message scanned. Bill - Original Message - From: "Smart,Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:57 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of

[SAtalk] Using dccifd instead of dccproc

2003-12-10 Thread Smart,Dan
The DCC documentation says that the dccifd interface is much more efficient than dccproc. I see from doing a spamassassin -D that it looks for it. Is there any install procedure for dccifd, and should this be the generally recommended interface for dcc? Why or why not? TIA <> --