Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Theo Van Dinter said: > That said, try running the sample-spam.txt message through "spamassassin" and > see what comes out. If it's doing the markup appropriately there, it's > definitely a qmail-scanner issue. If it's not, run with -D and see if it's > complaining about anything. spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:38:09AM -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote: > Received: (qmail 85522 invoked by uid 85); 17 Dec 2003 14:27:45 - > Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by redhat.vipersystems.biz by uid 82 with > qmail-scanner-1.16 > (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:SA:0(-8.0/7.5)

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:27:46 -0500 From: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jason Lieurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EM

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 09:16:07AM -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote: > It tags the message with X-Spam-Status: YES/NO and the hits number but no list of > the tests it ran, no rewrite of the subject, and no attachment of the original. 2.55 > did all these things and I don't see the problem with my loca

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Theo Van Dinter said: > When you say it does "NOTHING", are there any X-Spam-* headers? It tags the message with X-Spam-Status: YES/NO and the hits number but no list of the tests it ran, no rewrite of the subject, and no attachment of the original. 2.55 did all these things and I don't see the p

Re: [SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:26:18AM -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote: > tagged a message SPAM yes/no it used to list what tests were done but not anymore > and it does NOTHING to messages tagged as spam. It use to rewrite subject, say the When you say it does "NOTHING", are there any X-Spam-* headers?

[SAtalk] Upgraded to SA 2.61 from 2.55 followed advice, no rewrite subject

2003-12-17 Thread Jason Lieurance
Hello, I posted yesterday about how we upgraded to 2.61 from 2.55 and the subjuct would not rewrite even though the local.cf told it to. Someone advised to run 'spamassassin --lint' and fix the syntex errors which I did but it did not work. Also, when it tagged a message SPAM yes/no it used to lis