m Borland
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Training based on previously detected spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Graham,
Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote:
GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or
bad id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Graham,
Thursday, December 11, 2003, 7:21:52 AM, you wrote:
GB> I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or
bad idea
GB> to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained
tests, or is
GB> that a waste of time
At 10:21 AM 12/11/2003, Graham Borland wrote:
I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea
to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is
that a waste of time? Should I only train it with spam which is currently
managing to slip through?
W
I'm about to start training sa with spam and ham. Is it a good or bad idea
to use spam which has already been detected by sa's non-trained tests, or is
that a waste of time? Should I only train it with spam which is currently
managing to slip through?
--
Graham Borland
