Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-06-02 Thread Harry Putnam
John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 23:13, Harry Putnam wrote: >> John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Your observation got me closely checking my home made rules and >> edits. I checked by commenting them all then, uncommenting one by >> one. I found that this r

Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-06-02 Thread John Horne
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 23:13, Harry Putnam wrote: > John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Your observation got me closely checking my home made rules and > edits. I checked by commenting them all then, uncommenting one by > one. I found that this rule seems to be the culprit: >header FW_LO

Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It really a two part rule: > score FW_LOG -100 > header FW_LOG Subject /\[0030AB066D5C\]/ > > But the last part is what causes the error: > > Failed to run header SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error > at (eval 6) line 11, near ") ~" s

Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> [...] >> Failed to run header SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error >> at (eval 6) line 11, near ") ~" >> >> syntax error at (eval 6) line 19, near ") ~" >> syntax error at (eval 6) line 568, near "; >> }" >> [...] > [snipped] >> >

Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-05-31 Thread John Horne
On 31-May-2002 at 09:29:47 Harry Putnam wrote: > Just to make real sure, here is the output of ps waux|grep spamd > root 4166 0.0 2.0 8444 2604 ?S01:46 0:00 \ > /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -D -L -S > > I'm not sure if the perl part was always in there. I

Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 31-May-2002 at 09:29:47 Harry Putnam wrote: >> Still experimenting with getting my setup pretty close to a good >> working config, but suddenly ran into some problems I'm having trouble >> debugging. >> > [...snipped...] >> I see no debug output that

Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-05-31 Thread John Horne
On 31-May-2002 at 09:29:47 Harry Putnam wrote: > Still experimenting with getting my setup pretty close to a good > working config, but suddenly ran into some problems I'm having trouble > debugging. > [...snipped...] > I see no debug output that indicates a problem. I'm watching syslog > and c

[SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages

2002-05-31 Thread Harry Putnam
Setup: OS Redhat Linux Spamassassin 2.20 Running in spamd/spamc mode through procmail(sendmail) Still experimenting with getting my setup pretty close to a good working config, but suddenly ran into some problems I'm having trouble debugging. spamd is started like this: spamd -d