On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 17:13, Tobias von Koch wrote:
[...]
> A possible solution to avoid something like this happening to future SA
> code again is to change the license terms of SA.
>
> The LGPL, for example, would be a much better choice in my opinion.
>
> The LGPL would still permit commercial
SA is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself, this means a dual
GPL / Artistic license. The Artistic license permits to keep
modifications to the licensed code proprietary.
Gee, can someone make mods to SA and place them only under the GPL, and
thus create a branch of SA which is only unde
Although it is nice to hear that SA is becoming that successful -
even global players like NAI are getting interested in it -, the
acquisition of Deersoft by NAI will change - and has already changed -
the community project which SA is.
SA is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself, this mean
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 the voices made Jeffrey Thompson write:
> I would like to enable users of Spamassassin to tweak their own
> white/black lists (to start with probably could do more than this). I'm
> thinking of a web interface for this purpose (probably a PHP program
> with a form). The resu
Hi, I’m floating a small project idea to see what your
thoughts are:
Ease User Tweaks:
I would like to enable users of Spamassassin to tweak their
own white/black lists (to start with probably could do more than this). I’m
thinking of a web interface for this purpose (probably a PH
