On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> In theory you should feed your bayes engine a fairly balanced
> diet of spam and nonspam, without consideration of wether or
> not SA caught it.
I send anything scoring 10 or greater directly to /dev/null, so
these highly spammy messages are not includ
age -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] The correct use of Bayes
> At 05:02 PM 8/3/03 +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> >
At 05:02 PM 8/3/03 +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
I think that the autolearn is bad, because it only learns from those spam
messages that it knows to be spam for certain in any case, and the same
for ham as well. OK, it does not necessarily mean that Bayes agrees what
SpamAssassin thinks. Anyway, c
I think that the autolearn is bad, because it only
learns from those spam messages that it knows to be spam for certain in any
case, and the same for ham as well. OK, it does not necessarily mean that Bayes
agrees what SpamAssassin thinks. Anyway, currently I have autolearn disabled and
only
