> I would take issue with the "relatively respectable" part: DoubleClick
> is infamous for what many consider invasion of privacy in their
> aggressive use of cookies and "web bugs" to track people's web-surfing.
Well, I did say "relatively". While DoubleClick is indeed slimy, anyone
familiar
wit
Michael Moncur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This also appears to be connected (whether with their knowledge or
not)
> to DoubleClick, the relatively respectable banner-ad company. Here's a
> "remove" URL from the message:
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3824278;6743144;o?http://home.ingdirect.co
m
I've seen many "stock advisory" spams slip through recently. They tend to have
>From lines like this:
From: Investor Offers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anyone think this is worth a rule? I would think both "investor" and "offers"
(or either separately) would be a good spam indicator, but I'm curious whe
