> >
> > Timothy, that's the way that I have my procmmail set up as well. This doen's
> > work that well though for sites which filter on a site-wide basis.
>
> Yes, that is why I mentioned that I use a standalone machine. It would be
> a bad idea on a multi-user network.
To be honest I'm not ha
Hi Gary,
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> Timothy, that's the way that I have my procmmail set up as well. This doen's
> work that well though for sites which filter on a site-wide basis.
Yes, that is why I mentioned that I use a standalone machine. It would be
a bad idea on a multi-u
Hi Jim,
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jim Ford wrote:
> Why not use spamd+spamc - it was the key to greatly speeding up the 133MHz
> laptop I pick my mail up on?
I am looking at it.
Thanks!
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http:/
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:28:37AM -0400, Timothy J. Schutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I am on a single, standalone machine [Celeron 333] and a 56K
> dialup. I am using:
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> | /home/kc8hr/bin/sausr/bin/spamassassin
Why not use spamd+spamc - it was the key to greatly
Timothy, that's the way that I have my procmmail set up as well. This doen's
work that well though for sites which filter on a site-wide basis.
> From: Timothy J. Schutte
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 8:29 AM
>
> I subscribe to thirteen e-mail lists, several of which generate
> 50-100 posts per d
Hi,
First of all, I am on a single, standalone machine [Celeron 333] and a 56K
dialup. I am using:
Mandrake 8.1 [2.4.8-26mdk]
postfix-20010228
fetchmail-6.1.0
procmail-3.22
SpamAssassin-2.55
I subscribe to thirteen e-mail lists, several of which generate
50-100 posts per day. I noticed that Spa
