--On Friday, May 30, 2003 2:43 AM +0200 Thomas Wheeler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if the'll mind is I use procmail to auto forward all spam above
say score of 15 or 20 to them ?..
You can forward definite spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have no false positives at those thresholds, it se
, May 27, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on CNN!
>
>
> --On Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:28 PM -0700 Jeremy Oddo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Illustre Orman said:
> >> On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 14:09, Robert J. Accettura wrote:
> >>>
>
> They're asking for these messages. They want you to forward your spam to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Good! Do I just *forward* the e-mail to them? Standard forward, meaning
"quoted e-mail" with in-line headers etc.? Can't bounce the mail?
>> OK, perhaps we should play fair and only send an e-mai
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 12:28:59PM -0700, Jeremy Oddo is rumored to have said:
> Illustre Orman said:
> > On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 14:09, Robert J. Accettura wrote:
> >> http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/05/24/spam.bill.reut/index.html
> >>
> >> Yea! How sweet it looks!
> >>
> I quote from a rela
>
> Ummm... don't know where you've been, but the FTC _wants_ spam.
I don't know where I've been either, but WHOW MAN the colors! Trippy!
Just kidding.
> Send to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Two weeks ago, they ran out of storage space (at least,
> that's what the SMTP error said). Now they are ac
--On Saturday, May 24, 2003 12:28 PM -0700 Jeremy Oddo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Illustre Orman said:
On Sat, 2003-05-24 at 14:09, Robert J. Accettura wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/05/24/spam.bill.reut/index.html
Yea! How sweet it looks!
I quote from a related article:
"The F
