Hi,
[apologies for this being so far off-topic]
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Peter P. Benac wrote:
> And this lack of response is due to what???
Lazy, stupid, apathetic, incompetent, or ambivalent members of the law
enforcement and ISP community? Insufficient network diagnostic and
security tools, maki
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:05 AM
To: 'SATalk list'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SPAM, BLOCK: Death of monkeys.com DNSbl (fwd)
And this lack of response is due to what???
When I worked for Cisco one of Cisco's customers detected a potential hacker
to his system. That custome
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:12 PM -0700 Justin Mason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah -- a GPG-signed, private NNTP network would work great. Just needs
someone to code it all up ;)
Jesting aside, you could start a new newsgroup for this purpose, with
people posting the data to the new
'SATalk list'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SPAM, BLOCK: Death of monkeys.com DNSbl (fwd)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Peter P. Benac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OR worse they'll attack SourceForge!!!
>
> Yes Peter, that is the strategy.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 25 September 2003 07:12 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Peter P. Benac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OR worse they'll attack SourceForge!!!
>
> Yes Peter, that is the strategy.
>
> Rather than having the distribution of this information be
"Peter P. Benac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OR worse they'll attack SourceForge!!!
Yes Peter, that is the strategy.
Rather than having the distribution of this information being a cottage
industry, go for the protection of our peers.
I do believe that if whoever this spam friendly DDOSer is
David B Funk writes:
>On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Daniel Bird wrote:
>
>> A P2P DNSBL? interesting. I've also thought about this a little since
>[snip..]
>> DNSBL could learn from that seed other DNSBLS, and replicate the data,
>> and then (maybe?) do the RBL lookups locally.
>>
>> Obviously, the file (z
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:13:19 +0100 Daniel Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > A new approach to DNSBL might be considered, where there is a
> > peer-to-peer sharing (authentication, scoring whatever) that mirrors
> > content -- something of that nature, whereby t
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Daniel Bird wrote:
> A P2P DNSBL? interesting. I've also thought about this a little since
[snip..]
> DNSBL could learn from that seed other DNSBLS, and replicate the data,
> and then (maybe?) do the RBL lookups locally.
>
> Obviously, the file (zone) transfers involved would
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:13 PM +0100 Daniel Bird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A P2P DNSBL? interesting. I've also thought about this a little since the
> death of Monkeys but also have no idea about how this would be implimented,
> but certainly the model of something like direct conn
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
A new approach to DNSBL might be considered, where there is a
peer-to-peer sharing (authentication, scoring whatever) that mirrors
content -- something of that nature, whereby the hackers would
basically have to DDos the entire internet to prevent its use. Not
sure h
OR worse they'll attack SourceForge!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 16:04
> To: SATalk list
> Cc: SATalk list
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SPAM
SATalk list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SPA
A new approach to DNSBL might be considered, where there is a peer-to-peer
sharing (authentication, scoring whatever) that mirrors content --
something of that nature, whereby the hackers would basically have to DDos
the entire internet to prevent its use. Not sure how such a framework
could
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 3:07 PM -0500 Bob Apthorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First Osirusoft, now monkeys.com. Which DNSBL is next? When do the
> crosshairs move to SpamAssassin?
Why are these systems not available through lots of secondaries, with a long
expire time, so a DDoS can't
You guys are forgetting that dnsbl.sorbs.net has also been taken down
after a DDoS. One too many...
Chris
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
Hi,
Just seen on SPAM-L:
Apparently Ron's proxy honeynet hit a nerve in the hardcore spammer
community.
First Osirusoft, now monkeys.com. Which DNSBL is next? When do the
crosshairs move to SpamAssassin?
And when will the lawyers and Feds visit the asleep-at-the-wheel
instituions and ISPs hosti
17 matches
Mail list logo
