That's what I was thinking, as far as network checks. While they're often
useful, unless I have local copies I'm not going to try it. I'm using
spamd/spamc already. I was going to try to build an appliance-like device
out of the spamproxy & SA, so that there is little to no integration of SA
with
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 13:41, Bob Plankers wrote:
> However, SA is really slow, and I need to deal
> with 150-200 email messages per second
> for 85,000 accounts without a room full of hardware.
The two things you can do are 1) Run spamd/spamc so that you don't have
to load up a new spamassassin
Bob,
sounds like you're willing to write some code :)
The best place to start is in http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
The bug numbers of interest there for performance improvements are #47
and #62.
It's important to realize that some rules score -ve, so you have to be
careful about the order i
Hello all,
I've started looking at SA with an eye towards implementing it as an
opt-in spam filter for our mail systems here at the University of
Wisconsin - Madison. I began using it personally about three weeks ago and
I have been impressed by it. I really like the way SpamAssassin works with
t
