That's what I was thinking, as far as network checks. While they're often
useful, unless I have local copies I'm not going to try it. I'm using
spamd/spamc already. I was going to try to build an appliance-like device
out of the spamproxy & SA, so that there is little to no integration of SA
with the mail machines. Less for me to worry about when the rest of the 
mail team does things to the mail machines... :-)

...Bob

On 26 Feb 2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 13:41, Bob Plankers wrote:
> > However, SA is really slow, and I need to deal
> > with 150-200 email messages per second 
> > for 85,000 accounts without a room full of hardware.
> 
> The two things you can do are 1) Run spamd/spamc so that you don't have
> to load up a new spamassassin and parse the rules for each message; and
> 2) use the -L option, which disables all network checks such as Razor
> and ORBS.
> 
> Running spamd might also allow you to put it on a server or even
> multiple servers to keep the load off of your main mail server. If you
> have a DNS with a local copy of ORBS, RBL, etc., you might be able to
> run those checks fast enough, and eventually Razor will make its daemon
> software available for you to run a local mirror.
> 
>  -- sidney
> 
> 

......................................................................
Bob Plankers                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Wisconsin - Madison                      +1.608.262.7783
Division of Information Technology             http://bob.plankers.com



_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to