Re: [SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam

2003-06-28 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Andrew Joakimsen wrote: Has anyone else noticed that SA tags AOL bounce messages as spam? Which I also find to be incorrect because messages should be rejected when the MTA attempts to establish a connection, not after the message is delivered. Would this not rather depend on exactly how you have

Re: [SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam

2003-06-28 Thread Martin Radford
At Sat Jun 28 07:03:23 2003, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed that SA tags AOL bounce messages as spam? Which I > also find to be incorrect because messages should be rejected when the MTA > attempts to establish a connection, not after the message is delivered. That depends on

[SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
Has anyone else noticed that SA tags AOL bounce messages as spam? Which I also find to be incorrect because messages should be rejected when the MTA attempts to establish a connection, not after the message is delivered. Content analysis details: (5.10 points, 5 required) FAILURE_NOTICE_1 (-0.