Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 05:17 PM 1.22.2004 +0100, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:53:23AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Theo and/or anyone -- please help if you know the answer. I would like to
keep using this function now disabled.
BTW: here are a few of the errors that appeare
At 05:36 PM 1.22.2004 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:05:49PM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> >From what I have read, we don't meed to move up on perl (perl5.8x) until
>> SA-2.70 is released.
>
>2.70 (which is actually going to be 3.0.0) only requires 5.6.1, not 5.8.x.
FYI
Phew... That 5.8x requirement scared me a little. Glad to see this
correction.
-Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.6x causing server crash/reboots
On Thu
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:05:49PM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> >From what I have read, we don't meed to move up on perl (perl5.8x) until
> SA-2.70 is released.
2.70 (which is actually going to be 3.0.0) only requires 5.6.1, not 5.8.x. FYI.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"And the next time you
At 09:44 AM 1.22.2004 -0800, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thursday 22 January 2004 07:53, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> Perhaps this question needs to be directed to Theo Van Dinter who most
>> likely knows the answer I need. My server is going down freque
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 22 January 2004 07:53, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Perhaps this question needs to be directed to Theo Van Dinter who most
> likely knows the answer I need. My server is going down frequently and has
> been traced to SA.
>
> Yesterday I posted a
At 05:17 PM 1.22.2004 +0100, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:53:23AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> Theo and/or anyone -- please help if you know the answer. I would like to
>> keep using this function now disabled.
>>
>> BTW: here are a few of the errors that appeared every f
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:53:23AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Theo and/or anyone -- please help if you know the answer. I would like to
> keep using this function now disabled.
>
> BTW: here are a few of the errors that appeared every few mins:
> Jan 22 04:59:54 sage-american /kernel: pid 810 (
Perhaps this question needs to be directed to Theo Van Dinter who most
likely knows the answer I need. My server is going down frequently and has
been traced to SA.
Yesterday I posted a question about a perl5 function breaking and
apparently doing so on just about every message processed by SA. It
