Re: [SAtalk] Re: spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-31 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:10 PM 1/30/2004, Bob George wrote: Are the spammers using some sort of filter to obscure the text into something consistently decipherable? The messages I'm seeing lately remind me of the 'haxor', 'jive', 'chef' and 'kraut' filters (http://www2.dystance.net:8080/software/talkfilters/). While

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Chr. von Stuckrad
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:10:52PM -0500, Bob George wrote: > While I like to think they're slaving away trying to come up with > stuff that's almost-but-not-completely-totally-unlike-spam > manually, I suspect it's automated by now. It must be; yesterday I got a spam, where every word *including*

[SAtalk] Re: spammer reactions to antidrug (humorous)

2004-01-30 Thread Bob George
Brian Godette wrote: > Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that > untapped market of english lit majors/grads. Or Elvish for the larger market of Tokien die-hards! Are the spammers using some sort of filter to obscure the text into something consistently decipherable? The mes