On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:10:52PM -0500, Bob George wrote:
> While I like to think they're slaving away trying to come up with
> stuff that's almost-but-not-completely-totally-unlike-spam
> manually, I suspect it's automated by now.

It must be; yesterday I got a spam, where every word
*including* all the now standard bayes-poison from the
dictionary had about every third character duplicated
up to three times. This might even be bayes-fodder
instead of poison :-)  Bit this specific spam was again
missing punctuation characters in the bayes words.

Seems that different Spam-tools/Writers go into different
directions for a while, then converge to 'spam of the art'
later...

Stucki

-- 
Christoph von Stuckrad     * * |nickname |<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\
Freie Universitaet Berlin  |/_*|'stucki' |Tel(days):+49 30 838-75 459|
Fachbereich Mathematik, EDV|\ *|if online|Tel(else):+49 30 77 39 6600|
Arnimallee 2-6/14195 Berlin* * |on IRCnet|Fax(alle):+49 30 838-75454/


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to