Craig Hughes said:
> > - All headers are reproduced in full. Some address obfuscation has
> > taken place; hostnames in some cases have been replaced with
> > "example.com", which should have a valid MX record (if I recall
> > correctly). In > most cases though, the headers appear as t
Justin wrote:
> - All headers are reproduced in full. Some address obfuscation has
> taken
> place; hostnames in some cases have been replaced with
> "example.com",
> which should have a valid MX record (if I recall correctly). In
> most
> cases though, the headers appear as t
