Craig Hughes said:

> >   - All headers are reproduced in full.  Some address obfuscation has
> >   taken place; hostnames in some cases have been replaced with
> >   "example.com", which should have a valid MX record (if I recall
> >   correctly).  In > most cases though, the headers appear as they were
> >   received.
> 
> Nope:
> 
> [craig@balam craig]$ dig example.com mx

I knew there was something about example.com ;)

Ah well, that's probably just as good anyway...

--j.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to