Matt Sergeant said:
> > It could, but not in this case -- it seems to be IronPort, who make some
> > kinda antispam box.
>
> No, it's Iron*Mail* (who make an anti-spam box). Iron*Port* make the
> spamming box. :-)
doh! my mistake. ;)
--j.
---
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 the voices made Justin Mason write:
> Still, it'd be nice to know *what* they plan to do with it, how they plan
> to make it available to other antispam filter devvers without giving it
> all away to spammers, and if they have any plans for QAing the submitted
> spam -- it's ve
Justin Mason said the following on 22/11/02 15:59:
Diffenderfer, Randy said:
Consider this -- if this were a front for a bunch on enterprising spammers,
it might be a wonderful source of __valid__ addresses of all the poor folks
who send in their spam!
It could happen... :-)
It could, but not
Diffenderfer, Randy said:
> Consider this -- if this were a front for a bunch on enterprising spammers,
> it might be a wonderful source of __valid__ addresses of all the poor folks
> who send in their spam!
>
> It could happen... :-)
It could, but not in this case -- it seems to be IronPort, wh
Diffenderfer, Randy wrote:
"SpamArchive.org has just been launched. SpamArchive.org is a
community resource that provides a database of known spam to be
used for testing, developing, and benchmarking anti-spam tools.
The goal of this project is to provide a large repository of spam
that can b
> "SpamArchive.org has just been launched. SpamArchive.org is a
> community resource that provides a database of known spam to be
> used for testing, developing, and benchmarking anti-spam tools.
> The goal of this project is to provide a large repository of spam
> that can be used by researc
