Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does TextCat identify it as english? Perhaps we could add a
> language set to TextCat for "bad english" -- I suppose this is akin
> to the "spam english" we've talked about before.
I doubt "bad english" would work since word order has no effect on th
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> BS> Aside from the image attachments, the only identifying marks are
> BS> extremely poor written English.
>
> Does TextCat identify it as english?
TextCat wasn't part of SA yet the last time I got one. It might still be
i
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS> Aside from the image attachments, the only identifying marks are extremely
BS> poor written English. If they weren't so freaking huge, I'd read them for
BS> the amusement value alone. Last time one slipped through, it included an
BS> invitation to visit Mr. River's fact
Hi Derrick,
At 06/10/2002 13:04, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote:
>| Not true. We're starting to see spam mail with huge attachments.
>
>What sort of attachments? What are the main identifying marks on the
>messages?
Here's a nice examp
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:02:24PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> spamd would be the one giving the output, but it doesn't _have_ to
> output the whole message, just the headers that have changed. spamc
> wouldn't change in that respect.
You're assuming the body isn't getting mangled. Wh
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Don Bivens wrote:
> Just block China in your mail program. Or if you find
> my methods too agressive just block this one guy in
> your mail server, drop the route to him, or firewall
> him.
Unfortunately brasslantern.com is just a virtual domain hosted at a small
ISP. I do
Just block China in your mail program. Or if you find
my methods too agressive just block this one guy in
your mail server, drop the route to him, or firewall
him.
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
A
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote:
> | Not true. We're starting to see spam mail with huge attachments.
>
> What sort of attachments? What are the main identifying marks on the
> messages?
I've been repeatedly spamm
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote:
| At 06/10/2002 10:43, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| >| However, wouldn't it make some sense to try passing at least
| >| the first max_size bytes of the message to spamd for processing?
| >
| >Well, the idea is that spammers aren't se
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 02:51:13PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:43:02PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > That does sound like a good idea, though. You can use your MTA to
| > limit the processing of over-large messages and spamc can limit
| > spamd's processin
10 matches
Mail list logo
