On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:02:24PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > spamd would be the one giving the output, but it doesn't _have_ to > output the whole message, just the headers that have changed. spamc > wouldn't change in that respect.
You're assuming the body isn't getting mangled. What about the body report? What about making the spam a rfc822 attachment when score > required? (that one is not only a complete header change, it's a top and bottom body change...) It comes down to: Stupid client/Smart server, Smart client/Stupid server, something in between. Right now, we're in the first stage. spamc is pretty stupid, and spamd is pretty smart. I personally would like to keep it that way as much as possible. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "...[Linux's] capacity to talk via any medium except smoke signals." (By Dr. Greg Wettstein, Roger Maris Cancer Center)
msg06176/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
