That sounds good. I think people will need to put in the subject line
"SPAM" or "NONSPAM" so that the message ends up in the right corpus though.
And even then I bet some of them will end up in the wrong place -- I suppose
we could just look at the score/threshold reported for the message and
ass
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>
> In any case, forward as attachment is the one way to do it that
> everyone can use regardless of mail client, and the one way that is
> sure to preserve all the information.
wouldn't it also be useful to make "spamassassin -r" report not only
to r
"Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to admit that I haven't actually been
> monitoring sa-sightings at all.
I guess my intuition was right :-)
> Most of the reason for that is that I don't
> really have the time to manually process all the mails
Exactly. I don't see how a sight
Yeah, I think it probably might be better that way. I have to admit that I
haven't actually been monitoring sa-sightings at all. I've more or less been
relying on other people to notice anything particularly interesting there and
bring it to the attention of people on this list. Most of the
