Bayes database location defaults to ~/.spamassassin
The Bayes files are named such that they begin like, bayes_. Those are
the ones you want to remove.
Well, I tried that and interestingly enough my spam leakage became
a flood. So just for grins and giggles (I had no other ideas at the
Dragoncrest wrote:
>
> That's cool. So, which file do I need to nuke or edit or whatever
> to reset everything back to day one values? I don't want to delete or edit
> the wrong thing and end up with a total mess. :)
Bayes database location defaults to ~/.spamassassin
The Bayes files
That's cool. So, which file do I need to nuke or edit or whatever
to reset everything back to day one values? I don't want to delete or edit
the wrong thing and end up with a total mess. :)
By, "setting things back to zero," I assume you mean defaults.
Probably not a bad idea. Setti
Dragoncrest wrote:
>
> >Though his friends and family getting scored sounds very possibly like
> >some Bayes corruption going on because of the false negative
> >autolearn(ing) -- not a good thing.
> >Granted though, as the scoring from friends and family was not posted,
> >Bayes may not have had
Though his friends and family getting scored sounds very possibly like
some Bayes corruption going on because of the false negative
autolearn(ing) -- not a good thing.
Granted though, as the scoring from friends and family was not posted,
Bayes may not have had anything to do with it.
Hmm,
Bob Proulx wrote:
> > My normal daily email coming in scores higher than that. Heck, normal
> > emails from friends and family score at least 2.6 or higher. SO
> > something's a little whacky with SA, but I'm unsure of what it is. Anyone
> > got any ideas?
>
> What? Your friends and fami
Err, one more time:
./sa-learn --spam --mbox fales-neg.txt
That is, don't forget the *spam*!! part!
Bryan
Bryan Hoover wrote:
>
> Dragoncrest wrote:
> >
> > Not sure what to make of this, but for some reason lately I've been
> > getting some emails getting through with either zero poin
Dragoncrest wrote:
> Not sure what to make of this, but for some reason lately I've been
> getting some emails getting through with either zero points or very low
> points scores that are obvious spam.
What you are observing is natural selection in action. All mail that
is correctly tagge
Oh, that'd be:
./sa-learn --ham --mbox fales-neg.txt
That is, don't forget the 'ham' part.
Bryan
Dragoncrest wrote:
>
> Not sure what to make of this, but for some reason lately I've been
> getting some emails getting through with either zero points or very low
> points scores that are
Dragoncrest wrote:
>
> Not sure what to make of this, but for some reason lately I've been
> getting some emails getting through with either zero points or very low
> points scores that are obvious spam. Here's an example of the header on
> one of these emails.
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hit
10 matches
Mail list logo
