Re: [SAtalk] Re: Missing TextCat.pm in current CVS

2002-06-05 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel, > > for sanity in installation for end users, can we do one of the following: > > a) keep the single-unified language file for the distribution, and just stick > the component model files in a subdirectory under contrib, with the merge > prog

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Missing TextCat.pm in current CVS

2002-06-05 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel, for sanity in installation for end users, can we do one of the following: a) keep the single-unified language file for the distribution, and just stick the component model files in a subdirectory under contrib, with the merge program under tools, but where those files are in MANIFEST.SKI

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Missing TextCat.pm in current CVS

2002-06-05 Thread Daniel Quinlan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I found the site that textcat came from on the internet, and it > includes a set of language models, *.lm that the TextCat requires. > Does the TextCat.pm module require these .lm modules to run, and does > the distribution include them? The original language models m

[SAtalk] Re: Missing TextCat.pm in current CVS

2002-06-05 Thread Dan . Smart
I found the site that textcat came from on the internet, and it includes a set of language models, *.lm that the TextCat requires. Does the TextCat.pm module require these .lm modules to run, and does the distribution include them? Also, I've NEVER gotten a clean "make test" Not sure if the