Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-13 Thread Bryan Hoover
Robert Nicholson wrote: > > Is the mail or checksum sent to a DCC server? Checksum. > Could you try this one. It's also low scoring in 2.61 Here's the output I got: Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by coll.pair.com with SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Sat, 13 Dec

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-13 Thread Bryan Hoover
Simon Byrnand wrote: > Just a bit of a "me too" post, I checked my last two days email including > Ham and Spam and checked the hitrate of DCC and RAZOR2 and here were the > results: > > Ham: 0 DCC hits, 1 RAZOR2 hit out of 203 Ham messages. > Spam: 174 DCC hits, 57 RAZOR2 hits out of 242 Spam mes

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-10 Thread Simon Byrnand
> "Covington, Chris" wrote: >> >> On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is, >> of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it >> too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false >> positives)... but I've weighted my scoring according

[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-09 Thread Bryan Hoover
"Covington, Chris" wrote: > > On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is, > of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it > too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false > positives)... but I've weighted my scoring accordingly. S

RE: [SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-08 Thread Covington, Chris
On my site DCC hits approximately 20% of False Positives also (that is, of the 1-2% of false positives, 20% have Razor hits), so don't give it too much weight. Razor2 is the worse for that (50% of false positives)... but I've weighted my scoring accordingly. Chris -

[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-01 Thread Bryan Hoover
Kai, Nice, informative whitepaper (http://www.arrak.fi/files/arska_white_paper.pdf) on SA oriented spam handling. Bryan Kai Risku wrote: > > > Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're > > DCC is hitting with SA? > > A quick grep from last month's logfile reveals DCC hits > o

[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-12-01 Thread Bryan Hoover
Aaron Young wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote: > > > Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is > > hitting with SA? > > DCC is working fine for me. I have three spams out of eight that arrived > in the last 30 minutes that have a DCC match. Yes. Prese

[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

2003-11-30 Thread Bryan Hoover
"Christopher X. Candreva" wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote: > > > Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is > > hitting with SA? > > Well I just cleaned out my probably-spam folder a few minutes ago, but out > of 23 in there now, 13 hit DCC_CHECK Ah!