On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:39:12PM +1000, Shane Hird wrote:
> I'll state the obvious and say that spammers could then latch onto
> this and use it stop bypass filters.
Certainly. But on our site (12,000 users and 3GB of mail daily, 35%
of which is spam), I had to put several rules like this in
I'll state the obvious and say that spammers could then latch onto this and
use it stop bypass filters.
I am of the opinion that no score would be better than a very negative
score. Very negative scores should only be reserved for content that cannot
be forged (whitelisted addresses) or would be
