Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60-rc2 released!

2003-08-27 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:27:46AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > What would be the downside of just encoding any non-printable character? > Like URL-encoding, or backslash-escaping. The goal of the control chars is to use a sequence that won't ever appear in a real message. -- Randomly Generat

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60-rc2 released!

2003-08-27 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:42 PM -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, this is a GDBM issue. There's a bug already open for it, and we're discussing what to do about it. Basically GDBM is stupid and doesn't allow control chars in the token keys. Which kind of sucks. ;) Wha

[SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60-rc2 released!

2003-08-27 Thread Bill Maidment
Hi all I'm getting the following messages from time to time, usually on a Sobig.F infected email. Anyone else seen this? Any fix available? Or is this a mimedefang issue? I'm running mimedefang 2.36 Aug 27 13:23:34 mail3 mimedefang-multiplexor: Slave 2 stderr: Failed to run BAYES_00 SpamAssass

[SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60-rc2 released!

2003-08-27 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:37:45PM +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: > I'm getting the following messages from time to time, usually on a > Sobig.F infected email. Anyone else seen this? Any fix available? Or is > this a mimedefang issue? I'm running mimedefang 2.36 > > Aug 27 13:23:34 mail3 mimedefan

[SAtalk] Re: [SA-Announce] SpamAssassin 2.60-rc2 released!

2003-08-26 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:15:58AM -0400, Liudvikas Bukys wrote: > There are no 2.60-anything files in http://SpamAssassin.org/released/ > at the moment, Monday 8/25/2003 8:05 EST. Hrm. SourceForge is apparently having issues (again). When I started looking into this, the site was completely dow