On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:54 am, Chris Barnes wrote:
> Rick Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to appeal to the SA collective to change the name of the
> > PENIS_ENLARGE tests to something a little more innocuous. Apparently
> > some people find it offensive to see it in their email. I'
At Tue Jul 1 18:54:00 2003, Chris Barnes wrote:
> Q: how are they seeing this to begin with - it's in the header, not the
> body. Are they using some oddball email program that is showing them
> the headers?
SpamAssassin's default for spam is to put the report in the body of
the message, and co
Rick Beebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to appeal to the SA collective to change the name of the
> PENIS_ENLARGE tests to something a little more innocuous. Apparently
> some people find it offensive to see it in their email. I've received
> the odd complaint about the test name--usually w
>> I think Rick has a valid request... I run the mail server at an ISP, and
>> customers do get upset over the most trivial things. When they do, _I_
Me too, my http://jidanni.org/comp/spam/spamdealer.html jazz at
present still attempts as a regular non-root user to bounce spam to
supposedly whe
At Fri Jun 27 23:04:29 2003, Tom Diehl wrote:
>
> What I do not understand is that most MUA's now a days hide the headers unless
> you specifically look. If it offends them so much why are they looking at
> them?? The alternative is to rm the check entirely and allow the spam through.
> At least t
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Rick Beebe wrote:
> I'd like to appeal to the SA collective to change the name of the
> PENIS_ENLARGE tests to something a little more innocuous. Apparently
> some people find it offensive to see it in their email. I've received
> the odd complaint about the test name--usua
