[SAtalk] RE: [SAdev] RFC: blacklist_to, and execution order

2002-05-09 Thread Morbus Iff
>I would like a blacklist_to also, but I'd prefer that it simply added 6 >points to the score (the opposite of whitelist-to). Since whitelisting >doesn't turn SA off, there's no sense in a blacklist turning it on. At this point, if I don't stop SA being a resource hog, I can't offer SA to my user

[SAtalk] RE: [SAdev] RFC: blacklist_to, and execution order

2002-05-09 Thread Michael Moncur
> Looking in the configuration options, I see: > > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > which says that all the mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be whitelisted > - no spam > will be sent (I still don't understand the more_spam_to and all_spam_to > stuff, but hey). Actually it doesn't really mean th