Ryan,
My daughters machine is NOT sending mail directly to me, she uses the
mail services provided by an ASP opposed to an ISP. The Received from
headers do include an ip address that is in the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK list.
However the SMTP server is not in a RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK list. Therefore
it
> "TM" == Terry Milnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TM> Ryan,
TM> Ok here are the two headers again, both messages originated from the
TM> same computer, smtp server in outlook express is set up to use
TM> aloak.ca (which is not in a dialup block).
TM> The only difference besides content is th
I guess I'm either confused or a little too tired, but I'm not seeing a
problem with what is happening. The IP 65.48.80.27 is listed in the
dynablock list, so when the receiving system parses through the
headers it checks that IP in the various RBLs and gets a match on that one.
In any case, as
Ryan,
Ok here are the two headers again, both messages originated from the
same computer, smtp server in outlook express is set up to use aloak.ca
(which is not in a dialup block).
The only difference besides content is the recipient address, the only
difference in content was they also contai
If there are recieved-from headers from the recipient's mail system,
then they may get checked in the rbl's depending on how deep they are.
The recipient can use the 'trusted_networks' option that was added in
2.60 to get around that problem. I don't have the start of the thread on
the machine
> At 19:47 24/09/2003 -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
>
>
>>SA 2.60 is giving a dynablock hit a wopping 2.62 score!!! It isn't
>> really
>>a problem that your SA is hitting this rule (you can always turn it off).
>>The real problem is that everyone else's SA 2.60 is doing the same. If
>>they retain the
But you are missing the point, mail is being identified as
RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK when it is the recipient who is in the dial up block,
not the sender.
The sender is on the rogers network using aloak smtp/pop3 servers,
sending a message to a domain that is in the dial up block.
The message should N
At 19:47 24/09/2003 -0400, Gerry Doris wrote:
SA 2.60 is giving a dynablock hit a wopping 2.62 score!!! It isn't really
a problem that your SA is hitting this rule (you can always turn it off).
The real problem is that everyone else's SA 2.60 is doing the same. If
they retain the default 7 spam
> But you are missing the point, mail is being identified as
> RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK when it is the recipient who is in the dial up block,
> not the sender.
>
> The sender is on the rogers network using aloak smtp/pop3 servers,
> sending a message to a domain that is in the dial up block.
>
> The messa
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Terry Milnes wrote:
> This may be a little difficult to explain but here goes.
>
> All of my systems are behind a nat box. My mail server OS is linux,
> using qmail/vpopmail/mysql procmail etc.etc..
>
> Upgraded to Spamassassin V 2.60 rc6 (the day before the final release)
This may be a little difficult to explain but here goes.
All of my systems are behind a nat box. My mail server OS is linux,
using qmail/vpopmail/mysql procmail etc.etc..
Upgraded to Spamassassin V 2.60 rc6 (the day before the final release)
My daughter's system is on the same network as my mai
11 matches
Mail list logo
