Carey Jung writes:
> Could somebody explain to me why the BAYES_80 score for local-with-bayes
> (5th column, 5.300) is higher than the BAYES_90 and BAYES_99 scores? This
> seems counter-intuitive.
This should be a FAQ, if it isn't already.
Basically, the GA looks at the overall success rate --
I'm running SA 2.55. It uses the following Bayes scores out of the box:
score BAYES_00 0 0 -5.300 -5.200
score BAYES_01 0 0 -5.400 -5.400
score BAYES_10 0 0 -5.300 -4.701
score BAYES_20 0 0 -4.701 -2.601
score BAYES_30 0 0 -1.070 -0.927
score BAYES_40 0.0
score BAYES_44 0.0
score BAYES_50 0.0
sco
