I don't know if that's the case, but if you "--forget" the spam mailbox
first it should be okay.
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:58:42AM -0400, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
> The docs seem to say if a message is learned as ham, and then
> re-learned as spam, the 'ham' learning is undone. Am I understandin
The docs seem to say if a message is learned as ham, and then
re-learned as spam, the 'ham' learning is undone. Am I understanding
this properly? And has anyone tested it?
The reason I ask is this (and don't tell me it's a stupid way to do
this - I'm trying to cope with idiots, I mean end-users,
