The docs seem to say if a message is learned as ham, and then re-learned as spam, the 'ham' learning is undone. Am I understanding this properly? And has anyone tested it?
The reason I ask is this (and don't tell me it's a stupid way to do this - I'm trying to cope with idiots, I mean end-users, and my options are limited...) To provide ham for training, I'm looking at just feeding the users mailboxes to sa-learn. If the users decide a particular message is spam, they copy it (as a text file) to a particular folder on the file server, where sa-learn picks it up later. Aside from being innefficient, will this work? Thanks! Mike- If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough. ---------------------------------------------------- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
