On Wednesday 29 May 2002 23:20, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> razor.conf isn't necessary. I believe you can put in razor whitelist
> stuff in there, but... I just let SA handle that stuff and leave razor
> in the default state myself.
Actually, if you're not running spamd as root and you want to use
k out the code...
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 May 2002 16:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.
>>>>> "JP" == Jon Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JP> I (per
> "JP" == Jon Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JP> I (perhaps wrongly) believed that spamd would also pass the mail to
JP> razor as it was passed through. I if I run razor-check with the
Nothing with SA (the module, not the spamassassin program) nor razor
requires a home directory for t
boxes?)
Regards,
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 May 2002 16:20
To: Jon Paterson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor.
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:05:27PM +0100, Jon Paterson wrote:
> Although
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:05:27PM +0100, Jon Paterson wrote:
> Although spamd is catching stuff, I have not seen any indications that
> anything is actually going through razor. Is there anyway that I can
> check? I have also noticed that I do not have the razor.conf file
You can pipe the spam
Title: New user question regarding razor.
Hi, I have got 2.20 working, and have installed razor-client, and the sdk to get the perl modules, all OK.
When running the spamd in debug, I can see the it finds razor, and reads the nearest razor server.
Although spamd is catching stuff, I have
