Re: [SAtalk] More whitelist talk

2002-02-07 Thread Craig Hughes
Yeah, I thought of this while I was working on those rules yesterday, but I said "well what are the odds" and left it :) I'll fix it now. C On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 09:14, James Golovich wrote: > I just received a piece of spam that slipped through because of the > whitelist. > > Pertinent info:

[SAtalk] More whitelist talk

2002-02-07 Thread James Golovich
I just received a piece of spam that slipped through because of the whitelist. Pertinent info: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-94.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,DEAR_SOMEBODY, LINE_OF_YELLING,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,USER_IN_WHITELIST version=2.1 Since the default whitelist