Yeah, I thought of this while I was working on those rules yesterday,
but I said "well what are the odds" and left it :)

I'll fix it now.

C

On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 09:14, James Golovich wrote:
> I just received a piece of spam that slipped through because of the
> whitelist.
> 
> Pertinent info:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-94.1 required=5.0
> tests=NO_REAL_NAME,DEAR_SOMEBODY,
>     LINE_OF_YELLING,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,USER_IN_WHITELIST version=2.1
> 
> Since the default whitelist has *ebay.com it matched this.  Wouldn't it be
> better to use 2 rules?  *@ebay.com and *@.ebay.com
> 
> James
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to