Yeah, I thought of this while I was working on those rules yesterday, but I said "well what are the odds" and left it :)
I'll fix it now. C On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 09:14, James Golovich wrote: > I just received a piece of spam that slipped through because of the > whitelist. > > Pertinent info: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-94.1 required=5.0 > tests=NO_REAL_NAME,DEAR_SOMEBODY, > LINE_OF_YELLING,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,USER_IN_WHITELIST version=2.1 > > Since the default whitelist has *ebay.com it matched this. Wouldn't it be > better to use 2 rules? *@ebay.com and *@.ebay.com > > James > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk