If you upgrade to 2.60 you need to set your autolearn ham score to 0,
instead of the default of -2 in 2.55.
By default shouldn't the auto-learn threshold for 2.60 be set to 0?
(not at a shell prompt so can't look right now.)
If not I think it should be, otherwise it won't learn ham.
--Luke
As
> If you upgrade to 2.60 you need to set your autolearn ham score to 0,
> instead of the default of -2 in 2.55.
>
> By default shouldn't the auto-learn threshold for 2.60 be set to 0?
> (not at a shell prompt so can't look right now.)
> If not I think it should be, otherwise it won't learn ham.
>
>
At 8/29/03 12:34 PM , Matt Kettler wrote:
However, in 2.60-rc3 there are very few negative scoring rules. It would
be considerably less common for a message to get a sub-zero score.. Check
a message from someone that's whitelisted, or has a Habeas SWE header in it.
2.55 had about 64 rules with
At 12:12 PM 8/29/2003 -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
I just installed 2.60-rc3.
I noticed that the minimum score I am getting on messages is 0.0.
Is their a new default minimum score sa will assign email?
The lowest score it will give for example, is 0.0?
Ideas?
There's never been any sort of minimum
I just installed 2.60-rc3.
I noticed that the minimum score I am getting on messages is 0.0.
Is their a new default minimum score sa will assign email?
The lowest score it will give for example, is 0.0?
Ideas?
---
This sf.net email is sponso
