Mark wrote:
A few weeks ago I thought of an interesting new "statistical" way of
fighting spam. Having collected a few weeks worth of maillog data (about 500
MB), I wrote a small Perl script, matching IP addresses by the following
simple rule (in words):
"Look at SMTP connections, and consider all
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Mark wrote:
> MIMEDefang would, indeed, be an excellent place to implement this, as, on
> top of spamd, it gives you a bit of extra info on the SMTP session. :)
>
> Come to think of it, your implementation of this idea is actually a LOT
> better than my running a 'sec' post-p
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Maillog analysis
> Quoting Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
Quoting Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Look at SMTP connections, and consider all IP addresses spam that, in one
> session, deliver to 4 or more local recipients simultaneously."
This gave me a good idea for a test I could run in MIMEDefang. I have a small
wrapper in my mimedefang-filter around t
Mark said:
> A few weeks ago I thought of an interesting new "statistical" way of
> fighting spam. Having collected a few weeks worth of maillog data (about 500
> MB), I wrote a small Perl script, matching IP addresses by the following
> simple rule (in words):
>
> "Look at SMTP connections, and
A few weeks ago I thought of an interesting new "statistical" way of
fighting spam. Having collected a few weeks worth of maillog data (about 500
MB), I wrote a small Perl script, matching IP addresses by the following
simple rule (in words):
"Look at SMTP connections, and consider all IP addresse
