Hi,
I'm running SA2.44 on Solaris 2.6, sendmail 8.9.3 ( very ancient, i know..)
and procmail as mailer.
Mailclient is MS Outlook Express ( hiding now...)
My collegues don't want to have a report in the body anymore. All fine, I've
set clear_report_template and deleted SPAM: and "no report header"
At Mon Jan 6 15:42:32 2003, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> could be altered to that:
>
> M(F)IM(])E-(*/
> *)V(y)e(7)r(*)s(U*0)i(*LZ)o(H)n(.):(l)
> 1(:*=).0
> Content-Type: mul(26)t(fH*)ip(|*)a(***)rt(*)/
> mi(/*j)x(8)e('M)d;
> (<|)bo(*,)u(1**)nda(D)r(L+K)y=TFICLMGJ
>
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 the voices made Ray Dzek write:
RD> Umm...Since this thread started on another list, could somebody please
RD> explain, in english, the significance of the munged header?
Just reread the first one to this list, it was by me and it included the URL
to the story.
The significa
Monday, January 06, 2003 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] MIME-headers with comments in them
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony L. Svanstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 January 2003 15:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] MIME-he
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 the voices made Tony Hoyle write:
TH> I'm more worried about what happens when a virus starts using this - how
TH> many mailers
TH> are able to block executable attachments when the mime data is munged this
TH> badly?
What really worries me is what happens when people start re
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony L. Svanstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 January 2003 15:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] MIME-headers with comments in them
>
>
> Any bets on how long it'll take before som
(Somewhat stolen from a posting by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the procmail-list)
http://www.virusbtn.com/resources/viruses/indepth/junkmail.xml >
a header like that:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=TFICLMGJ
could be altered to that:
-
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered,
> have no embedded images.
>
> error below:
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of thi
SA is running fine but e-mails marked as spam, which are still delivered,
have no embedded images.
error below:
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C2B322.1E54A940
Content-
While RFC2045 says that the boundary parameter of the header
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; can be quoted or not,
spamassassin seems to treat them differently, in particular
it seem not to consider an unquoted boundary parameter as MIME.
rfc2045:
>Note that the value of a quoted string par
CTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] MIME problems
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> > Smith, Rick wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone working on this currently ? I see it's been assigned in CVS,
> > > wondering if there's a st
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 11:38:11AM -0800, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Smith, Rick wrote:
>
> > Anyone working on this currently ? I see it's been assigned in CVS,
> > wondering if there's a status function somewhere that developers fill
> > out when it's been completed...
>
> As far as I know, nob
Smith, Rick wrote:
> Anyone working on this currently ? I see it's been assigned in CVS,
> wondering if there's a status function somewhere that developers fill
> out when it's been completed...
As far as I know, nobody is working on it at the moment. The only tracking info
is the bugzilla t
ent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Smith, Rick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] MIME problems
>
>
> Rick, not positive this answers your questions, but:
>
> you can currently make the report appear only in the headers,
> thereby not
> breaking
ake a little longer to make it into CVS (unless someone wants to submit a
patch?)
C
Smith, Rick wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:41:36 -
> From: "Smith, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] MIME problems
>
>
> I realize
I realize there's a fix in the works for the problem with the report
being only in the header when the spam in question is MIME encoded.
I noticed that the CVS comments said that the tests were broken by the
addition of the fix and that it was rolled back.
Any clue when it'll be released with
Grrr The previous patch I submitted *still* wasn't quite right; a
malicious user could still send a mail which would result in an infinite
loop, eating up CPU resources and slowing down the mail server. *This*
patched I've stared at, slept on, and stared at again, and I'm positive that
i
Ok, thank. In CVS now.
Matthew Cline wrote:
> Here's a CVS patch which fixes the problem of the spam report being added
> before the first MIME part.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
Here's a CVS patch which fixes the problem of the spam report being added
before the first MIME part.
Index: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
===
RCS file:
/cvsroot/spamassassin/spamassassin/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus
19 matches
Mail list logo
