[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Latest SUBJ_ALL_CAPS rule in CVS
>
> On 27 February 2002, Mark Roedel said:
> > Posix character classes (a la [:lower:]) were apparently introduced in
> > Perl at v5.6.0. Is there anything in particular that'd be lost by
> > chan
On 27 February 2002, Mark Roedel said:
> Posix character classes (a la [:lower:]) were apparently introduced in
> Perl at v5.6.0. Is there anything in particular that'd be lost by
> changing [:lower:] to [a-z] to maintain compatibility with the v5.0
> line? (Otherwise, this rule throws out an er
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:21:30AM -0600, Mark Roedel wrote:
> Posix character classes (a la [:lower:]) were apparently introduced in
> Perl at v5.6.0. Is there anything in particular that'd be lost by
> changing [:lower:] to [a-z] to maintain compatibility with the v5.0
> line? (Otherwise, this
, 27 Feb 2002 11:21:30 -0600
> From: Mark Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Latest SUBJ_ALL_CAPS rule in CVS
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMA
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Latest SUBJ_ALL_CAPS rule in CVS
>
>
> diff -r1.32 -r1.33
> 47c47
> < header SUBJ_ALL_CAPS
It is that. I changed it last night. Except I shortened it by removing
the second half, which is superfluous (well technically I should have
done {7,} but I'm lazy)
C
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 07:39, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> diff -r1.32 -r1.33
> 47c47
> < header SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject =~ /^[
diff -r1.32 -r1.33
47c47
< header SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject =~ /^[A-Z0-9\W]{6,}[^a-z]+$/
---
> header SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject =~ /^[^[:lower:]]{6,}$/
Shouldn't that be
header SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject =~ /^[^[:lower:]]{6,}[^[:lower:]]+$/
??
___
