I think we will try to keep maintaining 5.005 compatibility for a while longer yet, I just don't have it installed myself to realize when I've broken something :)
If you're running perl 5.0x for now I'd suggest changing that one rule to just use [a-z] instead of [:lower:] -- If you're using SA with perl 5.0x in a non-US locale, well then get creative! I will fix the rule to be 5.0x compatible just as soon as we get bugzilla #47 done. C Greg Ward wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:37:29 -0500 > From: Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Latest SUBJ_ALL_CAPS rule in CVS > > On 27 February 2002, Mark Roedel said: > > Posix character classes (a la [:lower:]) were apparently introduced in > > Perl at v5.6.0. Is there anything in particular that'd be lost by > > changing [:lower:] to [a-z] to maintain compatibility with the v5.0 > > line? (Otherwise, this rule throws out an error message that "Character > > class syntax [: :] is reserved for future extensions" for at least the > > version of Perl that's included with a base FreeBSD installation.) > > Good point! Production mail servers tend to be upgraded more slowly > than development workstations. I'm currently maintaining SA on two > Linux machines, soon to be three; two are running Red Hat 6.x and one is > Debian 2.2 -- all of which have Perl 5.005 installed. I know Perl 5.6 > has been out for quite a while now, but I would like to see SA maintain > compatibility with 5.005. > > Greg > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk