On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 05:00:32PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:47:39PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > ConfStorageLDAP support, and if so, how do I get the patch
> > submitted into the SpamAssassin proper?
>
> As with all patches, you can submit it via bugzilla.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:47:39PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> ConfStorageLDAP support, and if so, how do I get the patch
> submitted into the SpamAssassin proper?
As with all patches, you can submit it via bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"With a PC, I always fel
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Kristian Köhntopp wrote:
> This is the revised patch, which I have tested and which seems
> to work for me now. I kindly ask you to apply this patch to
> 2.55 and test it. If you find anything, please report it to
> me. If the patch works for you, please co
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 16:16, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> This is an untested draft, which I am going to debug and test now. Why post
> untested code? Because the test setup is at a distance, and I will be on a
> slow debug cycle. I would like to hear opinions, though, and will submit
> finished c
n Dean [Wed, 18 Jun 2003]
> From: Colin Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kristian Koehntopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] LDAP Storage instead of SQL Storage
>
> I agree with Kristian that LDAP
I agree with Kristian that LDAP and SQL are very different beasts. Having
lived with both, I tend to work on the basis that LDAP can be a fast and
lightweight engine for high load read access and that talking to it
through an SQL layer could have performance implications.
On the other hand, using
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> One idea we've been thinking of for 2.70 or 3.0, was to use
> DBI for specifying database locations; in other words, just
> this.
>
> DBI uses URI-style strings to specify formats, access methods,
> etc. along with the db names; if t
Kristian Koehntopp said:
> I need my code for a project where there is a master LDAP with
> some 200 replicas nationwide, partially with 64 kBit/sec ISDN
> lines used for replication and mail forwarding together. If I
> were to store AWL or bayes data within the repository, the
> updates would ki
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:01:04PM +0100, Colin Dean wrote:
> Perhaps it's best to get some feedback on each separately to start with,
> and come back to this later?
Probably yes.
I need my code for a project where there is a master LDAP with
some 200 replicas nationwide, partially with 64 kBit/
Kristian Koehntopp wrote on 11 June 2003:
> Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm?
> I am looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within
> an LDAP store.
and on 17 June 2003:
> This is an untested draft, which I am going to debug and test now.
>
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 18:10, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
> store.
This is an untested draft, which I am going to debug and test now. Why post
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> If you compile your own (release >= 2.1.10, say) Openldap
> stuff, the opportunity is there to compile in an SQL/LDAP
> interface module that can be addressed using ODBC or other SQL
> drivers. It's generally reckoned to be horrible b
Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
Does LDAP interface with DBI?
http://search.cpan.org/modlist/Database_Interfaces does not list
a DBI interface to LDAP. Also, in my personal experience, you
cannot interface LDAP as a relational database without paying
huge performance penalities (LDAP is not even in fi
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:41:16PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> But the version number indicates software that might not really be mature.
> Perhaps a higher order configuration interface along the lines of
> getconfigvalue() and setconfigvalue() would be in order, which under the
> hood cal
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:48:43PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> > looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
> > st
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:48:43PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> > looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
> > s
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 12:48:43PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> > looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
> > st
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
> looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
> store.
Does LDAP interface with DBI? There's a ticket to move to DBI inst
Has anybody written a ConfSourceLDAP.pm analogue to ConfSourceSQL.pm? I am
looking for a solution that stores SpamAssassin Preferences within an LDAP
store.
Kristian
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology
19 matches
Mail list logo
