Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-19 Thread Gregor Hlawacek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 19. November 2002 11:03 schrieb Matthew Cline: > On Tuesday 19 November 2002 02:02 am, Gregor Hlawacek wrote: > > But here comes an other ineteresting question regarding kmail. How > > can I use kmail with SA on an IMAP account. There seem

Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-19 Thread Matthew Cline
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 02:02 am, Gregor Hlawacek wrote: > But here comes an other ineteresting question regarding kmail. How > can I use kmail with SA on an IMAP account. There seem to be some > restriction on automated filtering of IMAP Mailboxes and the > possbility to move mails between IM

Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-19 Thread Gregor Hlawacek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 19. November 2002 00:49 schrieb Matthew Cline: > On Monday 18 November 2002 12:53 pm, Erik Jakobsen wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I use Kmail here on a SuSE 8.1 system. > > > > These days I'm trying to set up a spamassassin. > > > > Is it necessa

Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-18 Thread Matthew Cline
On Monday 18 November 2002 12:53 pm, Erik Jakobsen wrote: > Hi. > > I use Kmail here on a SuSE 8.1 system. > > These days I'm trying to set up a spamassassin. > > Is it necessary to run procmail, and if so why is it necessary ?. You can invoke SA from Kmail, but I've found that doing so can make

Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-18 Thread Philip Mak
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 04:23:46PM -0500, Philip Mak wrote: > > Is it necessary to run procmail, and if so why is it necessary ?. > > Yes. SpamAssassin can only tag messages as spam, but it can't do > anything about the messages that are tagged as spam; you'd need to use > procmail for things such

Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-18 Thread Philip Mak
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:53:10PM +0100, Erik Jakobsen wrote: > These days I'm trying to set up a spamassassin. > > Is it necessary to run procmail, and if so why is it necessary ?. Yes. SpamAssassin can only tag messages as spam, but it can't do anything about the messages that are tagged as sp

Re: [SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-18 Thread Gregor Hlawacek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 18. November 2002 21:53 schrieb Erik Jakobsen: > Hi. > > I use Kmail here on a SuSE 8.1 system. > > These days I'm trying to set up a spamassassin. > > Is it necessary to run procmail, and if so why is it necessary ?. > > The only I can se a

[SAtalk] Kmail & spamassassin.

2002-11-18 Thread Erik Jakobsen
Hi. I use Kmail here on a SuSE 8.1 system. These days I'm trying to set up a spamassassin. Is it necessary to run procmail, and if so why is it necessary ?. The only I can se at the present that is running is the spamd, but its just running when my system starts up. After nothing happens. Nov