On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 the voices made Michael Moncur write:
> > Sitting here feeling foolish, I note that usually I can read.
> > USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO should have been a tipoff.
> >
> > I put the list in WHITELIST_TO since so many of the messages
> > discussing spam were getting filtered. Is there a
> Sitting here feeling foolish, I note that usually I can read.
> USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO should have been a tipoff.
>
> I put the list in WHITELIST_TO since so many of the messages
> discussing spam were getting filtered. Is there a better approach?
Not really. I put the list in all_spam_to, in fac
Matthew Cline wrote:
>On Wednesday 04 July 2001 09:56 pm, BASSY OKON wrote:
>
>
>
>>(b) That you would treat this transaction with utmost secrecy and
>>confidentiality.
>>
>>
>
>Which is why you sent this to a mailing list...
>
>You know, I'm suprised at how little spam gets sent through ma
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Ollie Acheson wrote:
> tests=INVALID_DATE,DEAR_SOMEBODY,US_DOLLARS,US_DOLLARS_3,
> RISK_FREE,LINES_OF_YELLING,SUPERLONG_LINE,
> USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX
> version=2.31
>
> How come mine didn't catch this?
It's in a
Sitting here feeling foolish, I note that usually I can read.
USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO should have been a tipoff.
I put the list in WHITELIST_TO since so many of the messages
discussing spam were getting filtered. Is there a better approach?
Ollie
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:55:33PM -0400, Ron Smith
Actually, SA didn't work for me. Here's the headed it added:
tests=INVALID_DATE,DEAR_SOMEBODY,US_DOLLARS,US_DOLLARS_3,
RISK_FREE,LINES_OF_YELLING,SUPERLONG_LINE,
USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX
version=2.31
X-Spam-Level: ***
How come mine didn't catch this?
Ollie
P.S. I admit in a
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Bob Proulx stated:
> The three bug lists for fileutils, shellutils, textutils became so bad
> that the maintainer decided to moderate them. Now those are low spam
> noise primarily because each message is scanned by a human (either Jim
> or myself) and out of every 15 or 20 sp
> You know, I'm suprised at how little spam gets sent through mailing
> lists.
You are not subscribed to the right lists! At least half of my spam
comes to me by way of mailing lists. May I direct you to a few such
as bug-gnu-utils@gnu, or skywagons@airbase1, etc. I will say that
sourceforge l
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 the voices made Matthew Cline write:
> On Wednesday 04 July 2001 09:56 pm, BASSY OKON wrote:
>
> > (b) That you would treat this transaction with utmost secrecy and
> > confidentiality.
>
> Which is why you sent this to a mailing list...
>
> You know, I'm suprised at how little
On Wednesday 04 July 2001 09:56 pm, BASSY OKON wrote:
> (b) That you would treat this transaction with utmost secrecy and
> confidentiality.
Which is why you sent this to a mailing list...
You know, I'm suprised at how little spam gets sent through mailing lists. It
wouldn't be that hard to w
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 the voices made Ives Aerts write:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:32:31PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > Hey, people start to send spam directly to spamassassin-talk... I wonder if
> > that'll help their business or not... ;)
>
> I wonder if they also sent it to spamassassin-
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:32:31PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> Hey, people start to send spam directly to spamassassin-talk... I wonder if
> that'll help their business or not... ;)
I wonder if they also sent it to spamassassin-sightings :^).
Cheers,
-Ives
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
