Sitting here feeling foolish, I note that usually I can read. USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO should have been a tipoff.
I put the list in WHITELIST_TO since so many of the messages discussing spam were getting filtered. Is there a better approach? Ollie On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:55:33PM -0400, Ron Smith wrote: > Hello Ollie Acheson. On 7/6/02 3:16 PM, from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you > wrote: > > > tests=INVALID_DATE,DEAR_SOMEBODY,US_DOLLARS,US_DOLLARS_3, > > RISK_FREE,LINES_OF_YELLING,SUPERLONG_LINE, > > USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX > > version=2.31 > > > > X-Spam-Level: *** > > > > > > How come mine didn't catch this? > > > > Ollie > > > > P.S. I admit in advance this is a very newbie question. > > Becaise the user is in a whitelist. > > Kindest regards, > > Ron > > "Yes, they were dinking with the DNS last weekend, and it got out to > the internet, then took awhile to 'repair' itself," said my friend. > > To which I replied, "Well, 'Dinking Happens!'" => > -- |---------------------------| | Ollie Acheson | | Morristown, NJ | |---------------------------| ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Got root? We do. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
