At Fri Jan 23 21:30:58 2004, Martin Radford wrote:
Five days to reach the list! I hoped SF would have cleared the
backlog sooner than that!
> This seems to be a signature with these mails, but I haven't put
> together a rule for them yet. The following *might* work:
>
> header L_SPAMMY_RCVD R
At Fri Jan 23 06:46:33 2004, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
>
> Below are the headers & I have attached the mail.
>
> These are getting worse.
>
> To top it off, SA learned it as HAM.
>
> If anyone knows of any rules that could work on these mails, It would be
> greatly appreciated.
[I've posted mo
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28318.html
That's a great post...we should add it to the wiki, if you're so inclined.
I'd be happy to do it, but I didn't just want to plug it in there w/o asking
the author first.
Regards;
DaC
--
At 01:16 AM 1/23/04 -0600, David B Funk wrote:
Trim off the Bayes poison and relearn it as spam. The payload
contains several unique misspellings that would be good Bayes
signatures.
Why trim off the bayes poison? Doing so just poisoning your bayes database
in a different way.
http://www.mail-arc
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> Below are the headers & I have attached the mail.
>
> These are getting worse.
>
> To top it off, SA learned it as HAM.
>
> If anyone knows of any rules that could work on these mails, It would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks All.
> Regards
> Tom
Title: Message
Below are the headers & I have attached the
mail.
These are getting worse.
To top it off, SA learned it as
HAM.
If anyone knows of any rules that could work on these
mails, It would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks All.
Regards
Tom
PS: I am using SA 2.62.
Rece
t; From: Charles Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:38 PM
> > To: Fogarty, Chris
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Helpplease
> >
> > Hmmm. Ya got me. I just stared using SA a couple of weeks ago.
>
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:37:49AM -0400, Fogarty, Chris wrote:
> So it seems to work through procmail without .forward. Does anyone know
> why this might be?
Is procmail your local delivery agent (LDA)? ala:
$ grep ^Mlocal sendmail.cf
Mlocal, P=/usr/bin/procmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qSPfhn9,
age-
> From: Charles Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:38 PM
> To: Fogarty, Chris
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Helpplease
>
> Hmmm. Ya got me. I just stared using SA a couple of weeks ago.
> That last log mes
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 09:37:31PM -0400, Charles Dennett wrote:
> Hmmm. Ya got me. I just stared using SA a couple of weeks ago.
> That last log message looks like it says DSN: service unavailable.
> Sorry, I don't know what DSN is. I'm an old Sun/Solaris admin. I don't
> recall hearing that o
stopher Fogarty
> Director of IT
> cell. 412 726 3917
> Ph. 412 232 3250 ex 216
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:00 PM
> To: Fogarty, Chris
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [S
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 06:16:00PM -0400, Fogarty, Chris wrote:
> Sep 21 18:00:48 ripper sendmail[30915]: g8LM0Ss30914: to="|IFS=' ' &&
> exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #cfogarty",
> ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (500/500), delay=00:00:00,
> xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=34746, dsn=5.0.0,
riginal Message-
From: Charles Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Fogarty, Chris
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Helpplease
Mine looks like this:
"|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #den
Mine looks like this:
"|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #dennett"
Note the #dennett. That's a comment from the # to the end of the line.
Yours was missing that. That's probably it. I
Charlie
--
Charles Dennett
Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
Sitemaster - http:
My .forward looks like:
"|FS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail
-f- || exit 75 cfogarty"
and my .procmailrc looks like:
# Pipe the mail through spamassassin
(replace 'spamassassin' with 'spamc'
# if you use the spamc/spamd
combination)
# The condition line ensures that only mess
15 matches
Mail list logo
