Yup...Sendmail was already configured to use procmail as the local 
delivery agent...calling it, again, via the .forward file, was confusing 
the issue.

On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Fogarty, Chris wrote:

> Oddly when I removed the .forward, I stared getting the 
> 
> *******SUSPECTED SPAM*******
> 
> headers
> 
> So it seems to work through procmail without .forward. Does anyone know
> why this might be?
> 
> 
> Christopher Fogarty
> Director of IT
> cell. 412 726 3917
> Ph.  412 232 3250 ex 216
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:38 PM
> > To: Fogarty, Chris
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Help....please
> > 
> > Hmmm.  Ya got me.  I just stared using SA a couple of weeks ago.
> > That last log message looks like it says DSN: service unavailable.
> > Sorry, I don't know what DSN is. I'm an old Sun/Solaris admin.  I
> don't
> > recall hearing that one before.
> > 
> > Charlie
> > 
> > 
> > "Fogarty, Chris" wrote:
> > >
> > > I swapped in your line
> > >
> > > And I am still getting
> > >
> > > Sep 21 18:00:48 ripper sendmail[30915]: g8LM0Ss30914: to="|IFS=' '
> &&
> > > exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #cfogarty",
> > > ctladdr=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (500/500),
> delay=00:00:00,
> > > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=prog, pri=34746, dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service
> > > unavailable
> > > Sep 21 18:00:48 ripper sendmail[30915]: g8LM0Ss30914: g8LM0ms30915:
> DSN:
> > > Service unavailable
> > >
> > > I am not sure what service is unavailable, or exactly what could be
> > > awry.
> > >
> > > Christopher Fogarty
> > > Director of IT
> > > cell. 412 726 3917
> > > Ph.  412 232 3250 ex 216
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Charles Dennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:00 PM
> > > To: Fogarty, Chris
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Help....please
> > >
> > > Mine looks like this:
> > >
> > > "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #dennett"
> > >
> > > Note the #dennett.  That's a comment from the # to the end of the
> line.
> > > Yours was missing that.  That's probably it.  I
> > >
> > > Charlie
> > >
> > > --
> > > Charles Dennett
> > > Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
> > > Sitemaster - http://www.kodak.com
> > 
> > --
> > Charles Dennett
> > Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
> > Sitemaster - http://www.kodak.com
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to