On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:57:13PM -0500, John Ruttenberg wrote:
> 1. Licensed mail sender has private pgp/gpg key provided by Habeas and
>uses it to sign outgoing mail. (Also adds haiku for legal purposes.)
I think you've just outlined the Verisign method of "stamping out spam".
At l
Adam D. Lopresto:
> The problem is that gpg/pgp aren't very well supported. Getting people to
> add a few header lines is pretty easy (I've considered it a few times, but
> never got around to it), but getting people to sign their mail is much
> harder. After all, that's the reason we aren't all
The problem is that gpg/pgp aren't very well supported. Getting people to add
a few header lines is pretty easy (I've considered it a few times, but never
got around to it), but getting people to sign their mail is much harder. After
all, that's the reason we aren't all using pgp and gpg already.
Mat Harris:
>
> this sounds like a heavily commercialized version of pgp/gpg. It would be
> just as easy to adapt MTAs to filter spam based on pgp keys (i'm not
> suggesting we do).
>
I was imagining it would just use pgp/gpg and not reinvent that wheel. The
idea was just to have habeas actuall
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:26:40 +, John Ruttenberg wrote:
> I sent this to Habeas Technical Support. But I think I'll get a better
> response on this mailing list. This seems like an obvious idea. There must
> be something wrong with it. But what?
>
> Here is a technical suggestion.
I sent this to Habeas Technical Support. But I think I'll get a better
response on this mailing list. This seems like an obvious idea. There must
be something wrong with it. But what?
Here is a technical suggestion. I think your business plan works by using
legal action against violat
