Adam D. Lopresto: > The problem is that gpg/pgp aren't very well supported. Getting people to > add a few header lines is pretty easy (I've considered it a few times, but > never got around to it), but getting people to sign their mail is much > harder. After all, that's the reason we aren't all using pgp and gpg > already. I notice that your mail wasn't signed; is there a reason for that? >
I really have no reason to sign my mail, but since I use linux, emacs &etc, it wouldn't be too hard. My situation is different from that of one of Habeas' licensees. Nobody is going to confuse it with spam and I am not trying to prove my identity. For commercial mass mailers, I don't think it's too much of a burden to sign... > > I strongly suspect I shouldn't even send this, since we're way off topic. > Is this an inappropriate mailing list for this topic? I was just trying to find the best forum for this idea. Habeas didn't seem to be providing one, but I know they pay attention to this list. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
