> -Original Message-
> From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Why? Because what I want is something that has the features of
> MailScanner (spam assasin + many configurable/pluggable virus
> scanners + attachment filename rules checking + a few other
> checks + configurable ac
John Rudd wrote:
>
> Why? Because what I want is something that has the features of
> MailScanner (spam assasin + many configurable/pluggable virus scanners
> + attachment filename rules checking + a few other checks +
> configurable actions for various things), but with a mechanism like
> spamc/s
John Rudd wrote:
Did I see, at some point, a message indicating that someone was going
to write a generalized spamd that could be used for checking many
different things besides just spam assassin tests?
or was that wishful thinking on my part?
Searching through the archives, I found a thread ta
John Rudd wrote:
>
> Does it work with spamc? or a spamc-like front end, where you can
> specify a range of IP addresses that are going to do the spam/virus
> scanning for you (like the way you can have multiple hosts running
> spamd)?
It's not bint do sendmail.
If spamassassin is stopping it's l
John Rudd wrote:
>
> Does it work with spamc? or a spamc-like front end, where you can
> specify a range of IP addresses that are going to do the spam/virus
> scanning for you (like the way you can have multiple hosts running
> spamd)?
It's not bint do sendmail.
If spamassassin is stopping it's l
On Tuesday, Jul 22, 2003, at 00:36 US/Pacific, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Did I see, at some point, a message indicating that someone was going
to write a generalized spamd that could be used for checking many
different things besides just spam assassin tests?
or was that wishful t
John Rudd wrote:
> Did I see, at some point, a message indicating that someone was going
> to write a generalized spamd that could be used for checking many
> different things besides just spam assassin tests?
>
>
> or was that wishful thinking on my part?
>
How about amavisd-new? Not using it, bu
Did I see, at some point, a message indicating that someone was going to
write a generalized spamd that could be used for checking many different
things besides just spam assassin tests?
or was that wishful thinking on my part?
---
This SF.n
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:41:59PM -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> Did I see, at some point, a message indicating that someone was going to
> write a generalized spamd that could be used for checking many different
> things besides just spam assassin tests?
What else would it check?
--
Randomly Genera
Did I see, at some point, a message indicating that someone was going to
write a generalized spamd that could be used for checking many different
things besides just spam assassin tests?
or was that wishful thinking on my part?
---
This SF.ne
10 matches
Mail list logo
